Australian AML/CTF · Sector guide

AML for banking services

Banking AML controls need to connect service-level obligations with customer, transaction and reporting information.

General information only, not legal, compliance, or other professional advice. Does not confirm compliance.

Start with: Does AML regulation follow your service or your profession?

Start at the service level

Banking can involve several designated services. Identify the actual account, payment or other service and its conditions.

A customer can use more than one service. The service and customer facts determine the applicable AML requirements.

Source: Federal Register of Legislation: 6, table 1.

A bank can also serve another bank

In correspondent banking, a correspondent provides services to a respondent financial institution in another country. Underlying customers may not deal directly with the correspondent.

For relationships involving a vostro account, sections 96 and 100 set due diligence, record and approval requirements. The required geographical link must exist.

These duties complement other applicable AML obligations. They do not replace every customer or reporting requirement.

Sources: Federal Register of Legislation: 96 and 100; AUSTRAC: Definition; due diligence and other obligations.

A bank can provide access for another bank’s customersUnderlying customer Respondent bank Correspondent bank
  1. Underlying customer

    Uses the respondent institution.

  2. Respondent bank

    Uses a correspondent relationship for transactions.

  3. Correspondent bank

    Assesses the relationship and applicable additional due diligence. Information about underlying customers may be limited.

A bank can provide access for another bank’s customers

The arrows show access through institutions, not ownership. The correspondent can have limited information about the respondent’s underlying customers.

Follow the process from top to bottom.

Invented example: inconsistent business activity

In a fictional customer review, account activity differs from the stated business purpose. Staff examine the evidence and record the response.

A difference can require further review. It is not proof of a crime. Staff assess the separate suspicious matter reporting question on its legal conditions.

Source: Federal Register of Legislation: 30 and 41.

Keep reporting decisions distinct

A suspicious matter report concerns the section 41 conditions. A threshold transaction report and a transfer report have different conditions.

An amount alone does not settle all reporting questions. Apply the relevant exemptions and transition provisions.

Sources: Federal Register of Legislation: 41-46; AUSTRAC: Transition to international value transfer service reporting.

Give the next team usable evidence

A practical handover identifies the customer, service, evidence, unresolved issue and responsible person. Retain the reason for the decision.

If information crosses systems, preserve usable links. A completed handover field does not show that the next reviewer received the evidence.

Source: Federal Register of Legislation: 107 and 111.

Sources and scope

Sources checked on 13 September 2026. This page is not continuously updated. Check the linked legislation and AUSTRAC guidance for current requirements.

How we prepare articles

This page does not cover: All banking products and correspondent arrangements; Complete cross-border requirements.

Common AML/CTF terms