Australian AML/CTF · Explainer

Placement, layering and integration

The three-stage model explains common laundering patterns. It is not a required sequence or a criminal-law test.

General information only, not legal, compliance, or other professional advice. Does not confirm compliance.

What the three terms mean

Placement means introducing criminal funds or assets into the financial system. Layering means moving or disguising them to conceal their origin. Integration means making the value available for use with an appearance of legitimacy.

These terms describe a common model. They do not make criminal proceeds lawful. They also do not define every element of a money laundering offence.

Sources: AUSTRAC: Printed pages 10 to 11 and 28: laundering cycle and scam proceeds; AUSTRAC: Money laundering.

Three functions, not a required sequence
  • Placement

    Criminal funds enter the financial system.

  • Layering

    Activity conceals the origin of funds.

  • Integration

    Value becomes available with an appearance of legitimacy.

Three functions, not a required sequence

The model describes common functions. A business can see only part of the activity, and an offence does not require a completed cycle.

Separate evidence questions. An answer to one does not settle the others.

Why the sequence has limits

AUSTRAC’s 2024 risk assessment explains that scam proceeds can already be within the financial system. A business may see only part of a wider pattern. It should not require evidence of three separate stages before it examines a concern.

Australian money laundering offences can concern dealing with criminal property. A completed cycle is not a universal condition. Use the legal definition and the facts relevant to the service.

Sources: AUSTRAC: Printed pages 10 to 11 and 28: laundering cycle and scam proceeds; AUSTRAC: Money laundering.

Example: one part of a payment history

A fictional customer describes a payment as business income. The supplied records do not explain the payer’s connection to that business. The reviewer records this gap and follows the approved process.

The reviewer cannot see earlier or later transfers. They do not assign a stage without evidence. They also do not treat the missing history as proof that the payment is lawful.

Sources: AUSTRAC: Printed pages 10 to 11 and 28: laundering cycle and scam proceeds; AUSTRAC: Money laundering.

Use the model to ask better questions

Identify the payment, parties, stated purpose and supporting records. Explain which fact needs clarification. Record what remains unknown. Use the money laundering and ongoing CDD articles for the legal and operational questions that follow.

Sources: AUSTRAC: Printed pages 10 to 11 and 28: laundering cycle and scam proceeds; AUSTRAC: Money laundering.

Sources and scope

Sources checked on 2026-09-13. This page is not continuously updated. Check the linked legislation and AUSTRAC guidance for current requirements.

How we prepare articles

This page does not cover: The elements of each money laundering offence; Detailed methods for concealing funds.

Common AML/CTF terms