Australian AML/CTF · Explainer

Collect and verify customer information

KYC collection records information. Verification uses suitable evidence to establish the relevant facts.

General information only, not legal, compliance, or other professional advice. Does not confirm compliance.

Start with: Does AML regulation follow your service or your profession?

Collection records information

KYC means know your customer. Collection records information from the customer or another source. Verification tests relevant information against suitable evidence.

A name or ownership chart on a form is collected information. The form alone does not show that the business verified it.

Section 28 requires KYC collection appropriate to customer risk. It requires verification of the appropriate information with reliable and independent data.

Sources: Federal Register of Legislation: Section 28(3)(c) to (d); Federal Register of Legislation: Section 5-2(2).

From a statement to a checked conclusionIdentify the matter Collect information Verify as appropriate Resolve differences Record the conclusion
  1. Identify the matter

    State the fact that needs to be established.

  2. Collect information

    Record what the customer or other source supplies.

  3. Verify as appropriate

    Use reliable and independent data appropriate to the risk.

  4. Resolve differences

    Assess conflicting or missing information.

  5. Record the conclusion

    Explain what was established and what remains uncertain.

From a statement to a checked conclusion

Collection and verification are different actions. The required evidence depends on the applicable duties and risk.

Follow the process from top to bottom.

Match the evidence to the fact

A source can establish one fact without establishing another. A company register can support existence without proving the authority behind a particular instruction.

Rules 5-2 requires policies to state when staff collect information and when they also verify it. The circumstances include source of funds and wealth.

Record the fact, source and conclusion. Apply the relevant customer-type requirements. Not every fact requires the same evidence or method.

Sources: Federal Register of Legislation: Section 28(3)(c) to (d); Federal Register of Legislation: Section 5-2(2).

Invented example: a company chart

A customer supplies a chart with two individual owners. A staff member compares it with suitable records and finds an intermediate company.

The staff member examines that link before recording a conclusion. The chart and the verified conclusion are different records.

This example does not prescribe a sequence for every company. A copy of the same chart in another system is not independent evidence.

Sources: Federal Register of Legislation: Section 28(3)(c) to (d); Federal Register of Legislation: Section 5-2(2).

Record gaps and exceptions

A practical file can distinguish collected information, verified information, unresolved matters and matters that do not apply. Each label needs a clear meaning.

If a normal method fails, examine whether another method or a specific legal provision applies. Record the reason and any limits.

Do not record a successful result without supporting evidence. More documents alone do not resolve an unexplained difference.

Sources: Federal Register of Legislation: Section 28(3)(c) to (d); Federal Register of Legislation: Section 5-2(2).

Sources and scope

Sources checked on 13 September 2026. This page is not continuously updated. Check the linked legislation and AUSTRAC guidance for current requirements.

How we prepare articles

This page does not cover: Identity vendor comparison; Document retention periods; Ongoing CDD procedures.

Common AML/CTF terms